Deferring a geographic expansion

Industrial distributor

Decision studied

Check demand before an additional site in Ontario.

The company was considering an additional site in Ontario, with a new logistics setup.

Approach

  1. 01

    Frame

    The question was whether to commit $300,000 CAD to the expansion. A validation phase of $18,000 was included in that amount; the rest remained conditional on its results.

  2. 02

    Investigate

    The file brought together existing purchases, transport costs and conversations with 25 buyers in Ontario. Several were interested in the products, but few could name an order that could be switched over quickly.

  3. 03

    Explain

    Two obstacles were examined: low brand awareness, or purchasing relationships that are hard to move. The interviews mainly showed that the suppliers already in place were meeting urgent needs.

  4. 04

    Build

    We compared an Ontario warehouse, remote sales from Quebec and the development of accounts in Quebec, using the current service level as the benchmark.

  5. 05

    Test

    An offer was made to 60 identified buyers over eight weeks. The thresholds were ten paid orders from at least eight organizations, with deliveries in under four days. The test produced four orders from three organizations.

  6. 06

    Decide

    Management dropped the Ontario site and kept only a remote service for incoming requests. The market’s theoretical potential did not offset the weak buying signal.

  7. 07

    Steer

    Six months later, the three accounts were still ordering, but volume remained below the level that would justify a warehouse. The project will be reviewed if orders grow steadily.

Test results

Buyers contacted60Paid orders4 (threshold: 10)Organizations that ordered3 (threshold: 8)
Funnel of the eight-week test with 60 identified buyers. Thresholds set: 10 paid orders and 8 different organizations.

What AI contributed

AI compared the offers, sorted the objections and organized the purchasing terms drawn from the documents. I checked the service costs and contacted the selected buyers myself.

Business model (projection)

The favourable scenario assumed $360,000 in additional annual contribution. The test ruled it out as a basis for commitment: only the $18,000 for validation was spent. The model below therefore remains conditional, as the project was not deployed.

Annual projection for this case
Initial investment$300,000 CAD
Annual gains$360,000 CAD
Costs to subtract$150,000 CAD
Net annual gain$210,000 CAD
Simple payback17.1 months (conditional, project not deployed)
Prudent scenario$30,000 CAD net, payback in 120 months

Annual projection built from the results of the engagement. It is not a guarantee of performance.

A comparable challenge?

Describe the decision to make and the data available. I will suggest an approach to prepare it and the evidence to gather before deciding.

Let's talk strategy