Choosing clients able to fund training
Training company
Shift from individual enrolments to corporate contracts.
The company mainly sold individual enrolments. The engagement consisted in identifying a priority buyer for its offering.
Approach
- 01
Frame
We had to choose a client group and an offering to sell within six months, with an initial budget of $42,000 CAD. Existing capacity had to allow the first deliveries.
- 02
Investigate
Analyzing enrolments and 18 interviews made it possible to separate participants’ interest from their ability to fund training. HR managers had budgets for specific problems, but wanted formats that could be applied on the job.
- 03
Explain
Weak sales could come from insufficient visibility or from an offer far removed from purchasing decisions. Discussions with managers supported the second explanation.
- 04
Build
We compared more advertising for public courses, a subscription platform, and short programs sold to employers, using the existing catalogue as the reference.
- 05
Test
A program was presented to 15 identified managers. The threshold set in advance was three paid contracts, each respecting the planned delivery cost. Three contracts were signed at $9,000 each, for a delivery cost of $4,500 each.
- 06
Decide
Management focused the next sales cycle on this offer. Additional customization requests are now priced separately.
- 07
Steer
At six months, nine contracts had been delivered. Two adaptations reduced their contribution; the standard program and the customization terms were revised.
Test results
What AI contributed
AI compared the requests from companies, organized the objections and prepared several program structures. I verified trainer availability and the existence of a buyer with a budget.
Business model (projection)
The projection counts 20 contracts a year, each bringing $4,500 in contribution. Additional prospecting and follow-up cost $18,000 a year. The prudent scenario counts ten contracts.
| Initial investment | $42,000 CAD |
|---|---|
| Annual gains | $90,000 CAD |
| Costs to subtract | $18,000 CAD |
| Net annual gain | $72,000 CAD |
| Simple payback | 7 months (at steady state) |
| Prudent scenario | $27,000 CAD net, payback in 18.7 months |
Annual projection built from the results of the engagement. It is not a performance guarantee.
A comparable challenge?
Describe the decision to make and the data available. I will suggest an approach to prepare it and the evidence to gather before deciding.
Let's talk strategy